Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jess's avatar

I think there's a very real disparity happening here, but as a 20+ year marketer, there is an element of nuance to consider with show round-up marketing like this specifically. Typically what's being included in those emails are shows that aren't selling well on their own. Not universal and not the only criteria, but it's a big part of which shows are included. I'd be curious to compare final ticket sale data to the percentage of inclusion for that part of it. 1,000,000% agree with you on all the points about standard practice for promoters (and headlining acts) to include their openers in all of their marketing. Really feels like a massive missing piece of the promotional puzzle. See it too often.

Expand full comment
Shaggy Snodgrass's avatar

As many of us have found out, Live Nation is a closed -loop system; a corporate theme-park built to simulate the music business. They control their signed artists, they control the venues those artists play in; and they control every cent of the ticketing revenue their theme park generates. Their booking staff is impossible to develop any relationship with, as they turn over too frequently; + they have proven themselves (like most staff at HoB, to name the most identifiable LN venue chain) to be borderline-hostile to any other part of a city's scene.

What's worse is, AEG and Bravo are trying to copy their model.

To be frank, women (or any) artists are far better off not trying to engage with LN on any level if they're not already arena-level themselves. They don't seem to do much for the bands that work in their lower levels at all, promotion-wise; as almost none seem to have 'graduated' above their smaller venues to big ones.

It's better to deal with independent venues, that are more likely to care about you as their success is tied into each show they book.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts